Bihar CM Nitish Kumar’s decision not to pay compensation to the families of victims of the hooch tragedy has multiple perspectives, both positive and negative.
On the positive side, the decision can be seen as a way to hold individuals accountable for their actions. People who consume illegal alcohol despite knowing it is banned are taking a risk and should be aware of the consequences.
Additionally, providing compensation to the families of victims could be seen as indirectly promoting drinking behavior. If individuals know that the government will provide financial compensation in the event of death, it could remove the fear of loss and potentially encourage more people to engage in illegal activity.
Lastly, not providing compensation can serve as a warning to others who may still be consuming illegal liquor or may start in the future, and can potentially discourage them from engaging in the dangerous behavior.
On the negative side, Nitish Kumar’s decision not to pay compensation to the families of victims raises questions about the government’s ability to enforce laws and maintain public safety. The production and distribution of illegal alcohol is a law and order issue, and the fact that it is happening suggests a failure on the part of the government to effectively address the problem. Additionally, there may be cases where police officers are involved in corruption and are turning a blind eye to the production and sale of illegal alcohol.
Furthermore, the state has a duty to promote “Nashamukti Abhiyaan” (alcohol-free campaign) and to allocate adequate resources to support these campaigns. However, governments tend to spend very low on these campaigns, leaving them ineffective in reducing the consumption of illegal alcohol.
Lastly, the state also has the responsibility to strengthen law and order, and to take strict action against anyone found producing illicit liquor. The government could take inspiration from other states, such as UP, where the government demolishes the house of gangsters, and adopt similar strategies in Bihar to effectively address the production of illegal alcohol. Only by taking strong action and providing support to the families of victims, the state can hope to stop the production of illicit liquor.
In conclusion, Bihar CM Nitish Kumar’s decision not to pay compensation to the families of victims of the hooch tragedy has multiple perspectives. On the one hand, it can be seen as a way to hold individuals accountable for their actions and potentially discourage the consumption of illegal alcohol. On the other hand, it raises questions about the government’s ability to enforce laws and maintain public safety, and the government’s commitment to reducing the consumption of illegal alcohol. The state has a duty to promote “Nashamukti Abhiyaan” and allocate adequate resources to support these campaigns. The state also has the responsibility to strengthen law and order, and to take strict action against anyone found producing illicit liquor. It is important that the government takes a comprehensive approach that addresses both the root causes of the problem and provides support to the affected families.
Click to rate this post!